Alzheimers and Dementia Summit

Cell Phone SAR Totally Misleading?

Posted by Lloyd Burrell on October 9, 2010 under Cell phone radiation danger | 2 Comments to Read

When you buy a cell phone it’s nice to know how much radiation you are exposing yourself to.  This is what the SAR is supposed to tell us.

But what if the SAR was totally misleading?

What Is Specific Absorption Rate?

SAR misleadingThe Specific Absorption Rate is a measure of the rate that radio frequency radiation energy is absorbed by the body. That’s to say SAR measures the rate at which your body absorbs radio-frequency from various sources: cell phones, microwaves, cell-towers, Wi-Fi, etc. that are present in your surroundings. In the U.S., the Federal Communication Commision (FCC) has designated an SAR level of 1.6 watts per kilogram as the public exposure limit from cell telephones.

With a cell phone the highest SAR is near the ear. Not surprisingly the highest rate of cancers reported by cell phone users correlates to the location near the ear that has the most cell phone use.

Is The SAR rating Reliable?

The Environmental Work Group (EWG) in its executive summary highlights that there are significant “precision issues” in the current SAR standards.

It’s important to understand the distinction between theoretical maximum SAR, the current measure,  and practical SAR in comparable coverage zones. The current SAR measurement is taken while at the maximum power output of the device, this may vary from phone to phone depending on the different modes. But the typical power output of a cell phone could be less than 15%of the maximum2 watt power output when operating in an area with good coverage and the cell phone tower is free from obstructions. So a given cell phone with a high SAR may well have the same practical SAR value as another cell phone with a lower maximum SAR when operating under the same coverage zone.

A phone that rates low on overall radiation according to the Environmental Work Group  cell phone radiation science review, may actually be responsible for higher cell phone radiation levels in practical use. A cell phone’s geometry, antenna placement and specifications may cause the phone to measure at relatively low radiation levels in tests, and measure differently when it is held against your head or used in headset situation.

Electrical engineer Alasdair Philips from Powerwatch says:

I have long thought that peak SAR was a rather misleading ‘red herring”. Some of the lowest peak-SAR phones actually have a higher total SAR into brain tissue than the much higher peak-SAR handsets – it is just spread out a lot more through the brain tissue. Generally low SAR phones are less efficient at getting their signals out to the base station and so regularly work at a much higher transmit power to compensate. Peak-SAR (the thing used for SAR rating) is just the highest value recorded for any 1 g of brain tissue (USA) and 10 g (Europe). It does not represent in any way the total SAR into the user’s brain.

Handsets have a power-control range of over 1000-fold in the power they transmit – they are told what power they need to transmit at by the basestation during the start of the phone call when the handset works at full power for the measurement to take place. Efficient handsets then turn their power down by often over 100-fold!

Choosing a low peak-SAR handset was really a diversionary exercise by the thermal effects only brigade, in my opinion.  It missed the point of non-thermal concerns completely. If the problem of brain cancer or other effects turn out to be non-thermal effects, then all handsets have a problem and choosing a low SAR handset will not help and might, in fact, be worse.

Should You Take SAR Into Account When Buying A New Cell Phone?

If you are committed to using your cell phone then using the cell phone with the lowest SAR level might seem like a step in the right direction. BUT if you think using a cell phone with a low SAR means you are safe, think again. Even a low SAR cell phone can pose a serious long term effect on your health.

SAR ratings are misleading. Buying a low SAR cell phone is no guarantee of safety.

More important than SAR is how you use your cell phone, see my cell phone protection tips.

This article was updated June 2016.

Alzheimers and Dementia Summit

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

  • Alyssa said,

    HI Lloyd,

    I’ve read all the info on SAR ratings, but still wondering if it is best to go with a phone with a lower rating if you have the choice. I recently switched from AT&T to Verizon because they use CDMA technology. I believe that was more important than SAR levels, however still wondering if I should go with a phone that has .60 head SAR level as opposed to one with 1.25 head SAR level. Does it matter at all???
    (The higher SAR phone is free the other has a high cost, that’s why I’m asking.)

  • Lloyd said,

    Hi Alyssa
    I wouldn’t be overly concerned with SAR ratings…… practicing safe cell phone use is the best way to safeguard your health.

Beating electrical sensitivity - The Path to Tread
Alzheimers and Dementia Summit
Shop EMF Meters & Shielding
“Low
Shop EMF Meters & Shielding
Electricsense donation

Earthing for health

diabetes obesity and emfs

diabetes obesity and emfs

diabetes obesity and emfs

emf protection book