February 12, 2016
‘Sensitivity to electromagnetic radiation is the emerging health problem of the 21st century. It is imperative health practitioners, governments, schools and parents learn more about it. The human health stakes are significant’
Dr William Rea MD
The War on children
Is this a new weapon? Not much info about how it actually works but ‘Karpesh claims his device works through electromagnetic fields’ is not encouraging.
Podcast with Cece Doucette. She is doing amazing work – well worth a listen, particularly if you are involved in campaigning.
Wireless education site (Doucette/Ahonen). Includes courses for schools, families and businesses.
Forthcoming event – not easy to read….. Hopefully more publicity will appear.
https://www.emfacts.com/2017/10/australian-consultations-re-5g-spectrum-deployment-and-telecommunications-legislation-responses/ – the headlong rush over the 5G cliff continues in Australia
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/03/opinion/wireless-verizon-telephone-poles.html – who benefits from the 5G concessions by government etc?
http://electromagnetichealth.o…..ealsb-649/ – scientists’ appeals re SB649
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TIXfx6OESwhUHPllJgSLw-Z63v4vMWkZ8Hw0WAbO43E/edit – template for a formal complaint about SB649
Kevin Mottus on 5G
Comprehensive coverage of many issues around wireless – not just 5G – including information and support for contacting legislators at State and Federal level.
Also needs testimonies from people who have been harmed by wireless radiation.
Wifi weapons. Use or mis-use of technology?
This has so many implications…….
Inpower podcast on liability action
The origin of radar
Started out as a search for a (thermal) death-ray. Seems they have succeeded, but the death is much slower than they originally planned……
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28967061 – sperm damage from 3G and wifi
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28963835 – and testicular damage
https://www.emfacts.com/2017/10/new-paper-rf-exposure-as-a-risk-factor-for-cardiovascular-disease-2/ – cardiovascular disease
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12275-017-7208-7 – EMF affecting skin – maybe someone will do the same tests using mm waves?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-12802-9 – mobile phones connected with headaches – what a surprise!
https://www.emf-portal.org/en/article/33359 – Hardell/Carlberg suspect under-reporting of brain tumours in Sweden
http://www.saferemr.com/2015/0…..-role.html – rising brain tumour rates in the US (Joel Moskowitz)
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/doc…..t/8049874/ an IEEE paper on RF shielding?
It had to happen sometime. It seems that ‘off’ no longer means ‘off’ if you’re Apple. Is new terminology needed? The article suggests ‘off-ish’. How about Noff (Nearly Off)? And it switches itself back on under some circumstances. In future maybe they will dispense with On/Off switches and functionality completely.
‘it results in both security and privacy problems.’ Omits to mention that it can also result in health problems……
February 12, 2016
General News Roundup
https://t.co/WQUecOc7sk – Interview with Alison Maine – mainly on Dirty Electricity
http://www.health24.com/Medica…..20171003-2 – techno-toys getting top billing as a cancer risk
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-05-new-research-discovers-how-brain-cells-used-for-navigation-operate-shedding-insight-on-brain-diseases-and-overuse-of-technology.html# – technology, memory and navigation
‘top neuroscientist Susan Greenfield of Oxford University has warned that the increasing trend to let our smartphones do the thinking for us could hinder our ability to make sense out of complex arguments.’ Could this explain why most people glaze over when one tries to explain the problems……
http://www.bbc.com/news/busine…..s-41367214 – hijacking of high-tech cars. And increasing dependence on software, which as we know doesn’t always do what it’s meant to. And more wireless radiation.
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet – Government ‘fact’ sheet on RF radiation
‘The only consistently recognized biological effect of radiofrequency energy is heating’ – is this a fact? Or spin?
‘Radiofrequency energy, unlike ionizing radiation, does not cause DNA damage that can lead to cancer. Its only consistently observed biological effect in humans is tissue heating.’ Note the careful choice of words…..
Also they have conveniently overlooked the NTP study
http://nationalpost.com/news/p…..-radiation – Petitions to the Canadian government
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mental-wealth/201704/10-ways-protect-the-brain-daily-screen-time – Victoria Dunckley on protecting the brain from screen-related issues
http://www.steelintheair.com/B…..loses.html – Big Telecom getting bigger?
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/m…..hoice.html – Smart meters should be optional
https://heartmdinstitute.com/detox-toxins/wifi-dangers-what-you-cant-see-can-hurt-you/ – Cardiologist Steven Sinatra on the dangers of wifi
http://www.fiercewireless.com/…..censed-use – Apple & friends want more – microwave spectrum bandwidth
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-08-mysterious-metal-towers-spotted-all-over-new-york-city-tunnels-and-bridges-surveillance-devices.html – anyone know what these are? Surely someone must have examined one with a spectrum analyser?
http://www.bbc.com/news/av/tec…..smart-tech – not much info about how it actually works…..
Most Users Ever Online: 176
Currently Browsing this Page:
Peter Williamson: 43
Arthur Fomalhaut: 12
Guest Posters: 2
Newest Members:EMFguy, Saba, OldHotRod, brjarrard, bnsh8, Anonymous, appleannie, ivahidmontazer, sarahk, takamine98
Moderators: Wifikid: 16, officeman: 0, WiFi96: 4, Peter Williamson: 119, peter williamson: 189
Administrators: Lloyd Burrell: 68, Lloyd backup: 0, Shabab: 0, shabab-test: 0